<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To pay, or not to pay?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tworiversmarketing.com/2010/02/to-pay-or-not-to-pay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tworiversmarketing.com/2010/02/to-pay-or-not-to-pay/</link>
	<description>Two Rivers Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:03:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Barnes</title>
		<link>http://blog.tworiversmarketing.com/2010/02/to-pay-or-not-to-pay/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tworiversmarketing.com/?p=423#comment-162</guid>
		<description>thanks for the message Mike. These are intersting times and hopefully the market allows for quality editorial to remain as a top priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the message Mike. These are intersting times and hopefully the market allows for quality editorial to remain as a top priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Osenga</title>
		<link>http://blog.tworiversmarketing.com/2010/02/to-pay-or-not-to-pay/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Osenga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tworiversmarketing.com/?p=423#comment-161</guid>
		<description>I agree fully---though I wonder given that, why companies and ad agencies continue to advertise in editorially weak publications/websites etc.?  I know the answeris  &quot;they&#039;re cheap,&quot; but they&#039;re cheap because they are not investing in staff written editorial or circulation (or both).

In a cluttered media environment, people are shying away from any channel that is editorially &quot;light,&quot; so if people don&#039;t open the magazine or go to the web site, because the content isn&#039;t any good,  what value is there for the advertiser?  

With all the stress on time, people are turning off to media that doesn&#039;t deliver good, timely, insightful information.

We always say good editorial is the best value-added thing we can provide, and you blog entry seems to reinforce that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree fully&#8212;though I wonder given that, why companies and ad agencies continue to advertise in editorially weak publications/websites etc.?  I know the answeris  &#8220;they&#8217;re cheap,&#8221; but they&#8217;re cheap because they are not investing in staff written editorial or circulation (or both).</p>
<p>In a cluttered media environment, people are shying away from any channel that is editorially &#8220;light,&#8221; so if people don&#8217;t open the magazine or go to the web site, because the content isn&#8217;t any good,  what value is there for the advertiser?  </p>
<p>With all the stress on time, people are turning off to media that doesn&#8217;t deliver good, timely, insightful information.</p>
<p>We always say good editorial is the best value-added thing we can provide, and you blog entry seems to reinforce that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

