Posts Tagged ‘trade media’

Putting the relationship back into media relations

Wednesday, July 7th, 2010
Written by: Greg Ehm

Lunch MeetingWhen I started my career in media relations we didn’t have e-mail and our primary way to communicate with the media was via the phone or through personal contact. However, as new technology — e-mail and now Twitter — has emerged I find our profession relying more on these new technologies to communicate with the media.

While these new technologies have made communicating with the media more efficient, have we lost the art of building a true relationship with one another?

Building a lasting and strong relationship through e-mail or a series of tweets can be difficult, because we don’t have the opportunity to personally get to know the editor.

As media relations professionals we are being asked to do more with less every year. Naturally, we have turned to e-mail as an efficient communication tool and by the same token the media has readily accepted this form of communication.

However, we need to examine our use of e-mail in our communication efforts with the media. Sometimes picking up the phone and having an actual conversation with an editor can have a lasting and positive impact. It shows you care more about the person on the other end of the line, and in my experience those conversations have resulted in some of our best ideas and work.

Not every editor has the time for a phone call, so we need to adjust our approach to the preference of the editor and respect their time. It’s also important not to abuse the relationship. In other words, you don’t need to call an editor to find out if they received your latest press release that was sent out 15 minutes ago. Respect their time and follow up in a few days or the following week depending on the significance of the news release topic.

Media relations is a still a relationship business and we need to re-examine how we are building these relationships. Personal contact takes time, but in the long run it may be the best investment you can make for your client this year.

Share with others:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Got relationships?

Monday, June 28th, 2010
Written by: Christina Schave

Woman On PhoneWhen my colleague Greg Ehm and I began formulating this two-part series on bridging the gap and improving communication among public relations professionals and print and online editors, I knew I didn’t have a lot of experience in the PR world yet (I’ve been at Two Rivers Marketing for three months). But, I was a trade magazine editor for four years and a newspaper editor for three years, and I worked with many PR representatives for hundreds of companies. In that time, I had good, bad, and ugly experiences working with agencies to get information on new products, interviews with manufacturer spokespeople, supplemental photography for articles, and much more.

I know a bit about which PR agency approaches work well and which ones might not, so I’m taking the former editor position here. If you regularly e-mailed or called me with pertinent information about your client’s news, products and events, you were typically on my radar when I needed a photo or an expert article source. If you worked efficiently and enthusiastically on your client’s behalf, I could tell that — even over the phone. A positive attitude and familiarity with my magazine’s editorial calendar went a long way in my book. I know I wasn’t alone because I’ve heard similar sentiments from many trade magazine editors in various industries. If you are this type of agency professional, keep up the great work!

In today’s fast-paced, technology-driven world, staying connected is easy — maybe a little too easy. The days of picking up the phone and calling a colleague have been replaced by e-mail. Special thanks to smart phones for making this task even faster and sometimes less efficient. Here’s the problem with e-mail: It’s easy to make a mistake, over- or under-analyze tone, and often creates more work to forward, cc, bcc, etc. Take care when you do choose e-mail instead of a phone call (I realize this is often a necessary choice). Check your spelling, punctuation, and tone. Remember: If it’s an extremely important, timely or touchy subject, pick up the phone. You’ll be glad you did.

You know what else helps? Taking a personal interest in the editors you work with. I learned this by watching the sales reps I traveled with as part of the magazine team. Watch and/or listen to someone’s attitude or body language when you ask about their family, pet, favorite pastime, sports team, etc. It’s a little extra work, and it may be something you have to consciously think about at first, but soon enough it will be second nature. Make personal notes in your e-mail contact entries about each person. From taking this approach with my agency contacts, I created stronger relationships and made many friends outside of a professional setting. Take the time to truly “know” your media contacts, and the work relationship will transition to a friendship and a mutual respect for one another and the respective jobs you do.

Communication fostering has to go both ways, though. Editors should make time to respond to e-mails in a timely manner, return phone calls, and do what they can to get the best information for their readers. They should want a relationship with agency partners because it keeps their publications top-of-mind for exclusive previews, releases, and articles that ultimately benefit the magazine’s readers and your client’s customers. The best editors find a way to balance these segments of their job, and they do it well.

Luckily, I recently became part of the public relations team at Two Rivers Marketing: a company I was very familiar with that employed people I considered friends. I knew they worked hard for their clients because I had been on the receiving end of their press releases, media alerts and friendly e-mails and phone calls.  When we saw each other at trade shows, it was like we had known each other for years (even if we hadn’t) and no time had passed since our last in-person meeting. Those are things I remembered when I got back to my office and made follow-up contact for future articles and coverage.

Remember: Editors are busy people, too. Now, more than ever, they have job responsibilities outside of the office requiring them to travel, write, shoot photos and video, attend trade shows, and meet with readers and customers — sometimes all in a week’s time. If you send a press release via e-mail and don’t receive an immediate response, relax. Give it a few days or a week before you make a follow-up call. There’s nothing worse than being on deadline, getting an important e-mail, flagging it for follow-up, and then immediately receiving a phone call about said e-mail.

The bottom line is: You never want to be the public relations rep whose calls always get rolled to voicemail. That counteracts the relationship-building opportunities I mentioned earlier, and you want those relationships.

Share with others:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

To pay, or not to pay?

Thursday, February 18th, 2010
Written by: Dan Barnes

PdSubscriptionAdvertising dollars fund editorial staffing and production costs for print media properties.

Advertising rates are based on circulation and readership.

Media circulation and readership has declined because media properties have made news and information available for free.

Advertisers are retreating from traditional print because of circulation decline.

Media properties now have to rely on their digital properties to replace lost ad revenue.

Advertisers are not simply reallocating print advertising budgets into the digital advertising space with those same media properties.

Reduced ad revenue forces media companies to cut staff which makes journalistic integrity vulnerable.

That impacts all of us as consumers of information.

The Wall Street Journal has had paid-for online subscription for years, with the New York Times working on a paid digital model to be revealed in the near future. One would assume others will follow.

So this brings us to a crossroads of sorts with both trade and consumer media. A few basic questions to consider are:

  • Will it be possible for media outlets to “turn back the clock” and charge for online content successfully?
  • For the advertiser, what is the value of an online subscriber versus the traditional print subscriber?
  • Does the flexibility and customization of digital content allow media companies even more advertising revenue potential than they have had in the past?
  • Are YOU willing to pay for news content online?

If your answer to the last question is “no,” you may want to think about the repercussions. Without money to pay people for objective news and information, we are putting critical, relevant platforms for our marketing communications at risk. One could go so far as to suggest the First Amendment (freedom of the press) would be taken to a new level with the public relying on unsubstantiated “experts” providing biased information. Personally, I hope traditional media gets this figured out in a hurry so we aren’t relying on “hobby journalists” for our information.

I’ve always believed that you get what you pay for, so I’m willing to pay a few bucks a month to maintain a certain level of intelligence and sanity.

Share with others:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati